Labels

.net (1) *nix (1) administration (1) Android (2) Axis2 (2) best practice (5) big-data (1) business-analysis (1) code re-use (1) continuous-integration (1) Cordova-PhoneGap (1) database (2) defect (1) design (3) Eclipse (7) education (1) groovy (2) https (2) Hudson (4) Java (1) JAX-RS (2) Jersey (3) Jetty (1) localization (1) m2eclipse (2) MapForce (1) Maven (12) MySQL (1) Nexus (4) notes (4) OO (1) Oracle (4) performance (1) Perl (1) PL/SQL (1) podcast (1) PostgreSQL (1) requirement (1) scripting (1) serialization (1) shell (1) SoapUI (1) SQL (1) SSH (2) stored procedure (1) STS (2) Subclipse (1) Subversion (3) TOAD (3) Tomcat (4) UML (2) unit-testing (2) WAMP (1) WAS (3) Windows (3) WP8 (2) WTP (2) XML (4) XSLT (1)

Friday, June 27, 2014

Joel Test: Applicability in 2014?

I think the Joel Test is still very applicable in 2014, almost 15 years later.  While organizations should be considering doing more than the list states in its brief yes/no questions, the Joel Test serves as a minimum baseline that organizations cannot dismiss or argue with.  Therefore, I don't believe the Joel Test needs updating. 

However, some worthy, relatively recent elaborations on the Joel Test include:
Being a consultant, I find the Joel Test applicable to new projects I join, rather than applying it to an organization.  When leading a project, it is also a good checklist.

No comments:

Post a Comment